<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Thoughts About the Twebinar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intersectionofonlineandoffline.com/more-thoughts-about-the-twebinar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intersectionofonlineandoffline.com/more-thoughts-about-the-twebinar/</link>
	<description>thoughts on communications and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:25:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jen Zingsheim</title>
		<link>http://www.intersectionofonlineandoffline.com/more-thoughts-about-the-twebinar/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Zingsheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intersectionofonlineandoffline.com/?p=33#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Thanks for doing the write-up for Media Bullseye, Mark. I agree that time does lend perspective, and I&#039;m left wondering what was really new, other than introducing Twitter into a Webinar format. It was great as a mechanism to introduce Twitter to people, so there&#039;s that. But I thought jumping back and forth between Twitter, Summize (because Twitter&#039;s reply functionality was broken, more on that in a second), and the webinar was distracting. Some of those tweeting felt the same way, and tweeted that they were going to stop tweeting and just watch the webinar...not so &quot;game changing&quot; there. ;-)
Your point about a logistical nightmare needs to be seriously considered. To me, that means even moderate adoption of this format is unlikely--most companies and groups aren&#039;t going to want to tackle pulling the technologies together. And, your point about Twitter&#039;s reliability *really* needs to be taken to heart. It&#039;s been down more than up since the Twebinar...frustrating to those who have been on it, and &quot;get it&quot;--can you imagine what someone who has just been introduced to Twitter must be thinking? 

Communications channels have to be reliable to be truly incorporated into a PR practitioner&#039;s toolbox. Until Twitter is rock-solid, I can&#039;t see this as any more than an interesting experiment, but I do applaud all for trying something new.

Jen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for doing the write-up for Media Bullseye, Mark. I agree that time does lend perspective, and I&#8217;m left wondering what was really new, other than introducing Twitter into a Webinar format. It was great as a mechanism to introduce Twitter to people, so there&#8217;s that. But I thought jumping back and forth between Twitter, Summize (because Twitter&#8217;s reply functionality was broken, more on that in a second), and the webinar was distracting. Some of those tweeting felt the same way, and tweeted that they were going to stop tweeting and just watch the webinar&#8230;not so &#8220;game changing&#8221; there. <img src='http://www.intersectionofonlineandoffline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Your point about a logistical nightmare needs to be seriously considered. To me, that means even moderate adoption of this format is unlikely&#8211;most companies and groups aren&#8217;t going to want to tackle pulling the technologies together. And, your point about Twitter&#8217;s reliability *really* needs to be taken to heart. It&#8217;s been down more than up since the Twebinar&#8230;frustrating to those who have been on it, and &#8220;get it&#8221;&#8211;can you imagine what someone who has just been introduced to Twitter must be thinking? </p>
<p>Communications channels have to be reliable to be truly incorporated into a PR practitioner&#8217;s toolbox. Until Twitter is rock-solid, I can&#8217;t see this as any more than an interesting experiment, but I do applaud all for trying something new.</p>
<p>Jen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brogan...</title>
		<link>http://www.intersectionofonlineandoffline.com/more-thoughts-about-the-twebinar/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brogan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intersectionofonlineandoffline.com/?p=33#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Glad it worked for you. Episodes 2 and 3 will bring it forward even more, I hope. : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad it worked for you. Episodes 2 and 3 will bring it forward even more, I hope. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

